Connect with us

Cryptocurrency

Survey Finds Many Finance Managers Are Not Planning to Hold BTC— Volatility Cited as Key Concern – Finance Bitcoin News

Published

on

Terence Zimwara

A new poll of finance managers by Gartner Finance finds that a majority are not planning to hold bitcoin as a corporate asset. In their responses, most of the 77 finance leaders interviewed cite bitcoin’s volatility as one characteristic of the crypto asset that is “extremely difficult to mitigate.”

The Concerns of Finance Executives

The survey’s findings appear to contradict the growing sentiment that many more listed companies will follow in the footsteps of Telsa, Microstrategy, and Square Inc. In a statement released alongside the survey’s findings, Alexander Bant, chief of research at Gartner Finance reveals that 84% of the respondents believe that “bitcoin’s volatility posed a financial risk.” In addition to the cryptocurrency’s volatility, the executives also name six other areas of concern.

Survey Finds Many Finance Managers Are Not Planning to Hold BTC— Volatility Cited as Key Concern

As shown by the survey’s findings, about 39% of the respondents cite their board’s risk aversion as another factor that contributes to the decision not to hold BTC. About 38% cite the slow adoption of the crypto asset as an accepted form of payment or exchange. Regulatory concerns (32%) and lack of expertise in dealing with cryptocurrencies (30%) are the next major reasons cited by the top finance leaders.

Still, the findings suggest that understanding the impact of holding BTC on companies like Telsa and Microstrategy will become a factor for finance managers that may want to follow suit. According to Gartner Finance’s statement:

(About) 71% of respondents said one of the top things they’d like to know is what others are actually doing with bitcoin. (A further) 68% want to hear more from regulators about bitcoin and better understand the risks involved with holding it.

Prospective Buyers Are Not in a Hurry

Meanwhile, the findings also show that 16% of respondents that are willing to adopt cryptocurrency as part of their organization’s financial strategy, appear to be in no rush to do so. Regarding those that have near term plans, the findings show:

Five per cent of respondents indicated they would begin to hold bitcoin in 2021, 1% said they’d hold bitcoin at some point in 2022-2023, and the remaining 9% who indicated they would begin holding bitcoin said it would be 2024 or later.

In the meantime, the survey findings show that “there was no difference in intent to hold bitcoin between small organizations ($1 billion revenue).” Fifty percent of respondents from the technology sector anticipate holding the leading cryptocurrency in the future. Private company finance executives were less favorable towards bitcoin with just 7% saying they would ever hold it.

Do you agree with the findings of this survey? You can tell us what you think in the comments section below.

Image Credits: Shutterstock, Pixabay, Wiki Commons

Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only. It is not a direct offer or solicitation of an offer to buy or sell, or a recommendation or endorsement of any products, services, or companies. Bitcoin.com does not provide investment, tax, legal, or accounting advice. Neither the company nor the author is responsible, directly or indirectly, for any damage or loss caused or alleged to be caused by or in connection with the use of or reliance on any content, goods or services mentioned in this article.





Source link

Cryptocurrency

Camarasal Poll Shows Entrepreneurs Are Worried About Bitcoin Law in El Salvador – Economics Bitcoin News

Published

on

Sergio Goschenko

Camarasal, a well known entrepreneur association in El Salvador, announced the results of a poll made this month. The poll shows almost 100% of Salvadorans worry about the implementation of the bitcoin tender law approved recently. Most criticize the obligatory character of receiving bitcoin payments and don’t expect this move to bring investment to the country.

Camarasal Poll Shows Concerns About Bitcoin Tender Law Implementation

A quick poll conducted by Camarasal, one of the biggest entrepreneur groups in El Salvador, is showing people have deep concerns about the future application of the Bitcoin Law. The poll got more than 1,600 answers in just four days from entrepreneurs and non-entrepreneurs. Camarasal president Jorge Hasbún stated on the massive participation that:

We believe that this excellent response is a reflection of how urgent this issue is for Salvadorans, in the sense of the implications it will have for the family economy on a day-to-day basis.

More than 96% of the entrepreneurs polled prefer an optional use of bitcoin for payments. The bitcoin tender law forces entrepreneurs to accept bitcoin for payments, as long as the entrepreneur manages the technological infrastructure to do so. In the same way, 45.3% indicated they were concerned that the circulation of cryptocurrency in the country is mandatory; while 35.9% assured that it generates mistrust.

Also, most of the entrepreneurs won’t keep the bitcoin received as payment for their goods and services: 51.6% of them answered they would exchange the bitcoin received for dollars. Bitcoin is a pretty volatile asset too, and that scares entrepreneurs that work with tight margins.

Non-Entrepreneurs Also Skeptical About Bitcoin

Camarasal also polled non-entrepreneurs, but the answers were not optimistic either. About using bitcoin as a medium of exchange, 36% said they are concerned and 39% said they distrusted it. The topic of wages and remittances was also included in the poll. El Salvador is a remittance-intensive country, with 23% of the GDP coming from these, according to AP. 93.2% said that they do not want to receive their salary in cryptocurrency, while 82.5% assured that they are not interested in receiving remittances in bitcoin.

Salvadoreans are still lack training on bitcoin and its management, and that might be the key behind these unoptimistic answers. Camarasal vicepresident Carmen Alas stated:

It will be essential that there is a broad consultation with an interdisciplinary group that represents the sectors involved for the construction of the regulations that make this law operational

What do you think about Camarasal’s latest poll in El Salvador? Tell us in the comments section below.

Image Credits: Shutterstock, Pixabay, Wiki Commons

Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only. It is not a direct offer or solicitation of an offer to buy or sell, or a recommendation or endorsement of any products, services, or companies. Bitcoin.com does not provide investment, tax, legal, or accounting advice. Neither the company nor the author is responsible, directly or indirectly, for any damage or loss caused or alleged to be caused by or in connection with the use of or reliance on any content, goods or services mentioned in this article.





Source link

Continue Reading

Cryptocurrency

SEC Seeks Commentary From ‘Interested’ Individuals on Vaneck Bitcoin ETF – Regulation Bitcoin News

Published

on

Jamie Redman

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is currently seeking additional commentary from the public, as the regulating body ponders the Vaneck bitcoin exchange-traded fund (ETF) decision. In a notice published on Wednesday, the SEC thinks “interested persons” should provide comments on the proceedings.

SEC Is Looking for Comments Concerning Vaneck’s Proposed Bitcoin ETF Listing

In December 2020, New York-based investment management firm Vaneck filed with the SEC to list a bitcoin ETF. Following the original filing, in March 2021, the Chicago Board Options Exchange (Cboe) applied to list the Vaneck Bitcoin Trust. Then at the end of April, as the U.S. regulator was determining whether or not it would reach a conclusion on the Vaneck ETF, the SEC gave itself 45 more days to decide.

The SEC’s order detailed that the notice of designation has been postponed to June 17, 2021. The regulator could increase it to a “longer period up to 90 days” the notice said. “As the Commission may designate if it finds such longer period to be appropriate and publishes its reasons,” the U.S. regulator’s order revealed. The order was composed by the SEC’s assistant secretary Matt DeLesDernier on April 28, 2021.

This week, on June 16, 2021, the SEC has disclosed that it’s seeking commentary from “interested persons” who are for or against the Vaneck bitcoin ETF listing. Interested commenters have approximately 21 days to give a statement to the regulator.

“The Commission is instituting proceedings pursuant to Section 19(b)(2)(B) of the Act14 to determine whether the proposed rule change should be approved or disapproved. Institution of proceedings is appropriate at this time in view of the legal and policy issues raised by the proposed rule change, as discussed below,” the SEC’s June 16 notice discloses. The announcement adds:

[The] institution of proceedings does not indicate that the Commission has reached any conclusions with respect to any of the issues involved. Rather, as described below, the Commission seeks and encourages interested persons to provide comments on the proposed rule change.

SEC’s Decisions Designed to ‘Protect Investors and the Public Interest’

The U.S. regulator declares that its methods for decision-making are in the best interests of the public. Moreover, the SEC may institute procedures that allow for further review of the proposed rule change.

“Pursuant to Section 19(b)(2)(B) of the Act, the Commission is providing notice of the grounds for disapproval under consideration,” the notice details. “The Commission is instituting proceedings to allow for additional analysis of the proposed rule change’s consistency with Section 6(b)(5) of the Act, which requires, among other things, that the rules of a national securities exchange be ‘designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices’ and ‘to protect investors and the public interest.’”

This is not the first time the U.S. regulator has asked for statements concerning approval or disapproval of a bitcoin-based ETF in the country. So far, however, despite the many applicants in 2021 and previous years, the Securities and Exchange Commission has yet to approve a bitcoin ETF.

What do you think about the SEC seeking commentary on the Vaneck Bitcoin Trust? Do you think the U.S. regulator will approve a bitcoin ETF this year? Let us know what you think in the comments section below.

Tags in this story
45 days, approval, Bitcoin, Bitcoin (BTC), BTC, Decision Making, exchange traded fund, Matt DeLesDernier, Postponed, Public Commentary, Public Interest, Regulation, SEC, us regulator, vaneck, Vaneck bitcoin ETF

Image Credits: Shutterstock, Pixabay, Wiki Commons, SEC Logo,

Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only. It is not a direct offer or solicitation of an offer to buy or sell, or a recommendation or endorsement of any products, services, or companies. Bitcoin.com does not provide investment, tax, legal, or accounting advice. Neither the company nor the author is responsible, directly or indirectly, for any damage or loss caused or alleged to be caused by or in connection with the use of or reliance on any content, goods or services mentioned in this article.





Source link

Continue Reading

Cryptocurrency

Bitdao Collects $230 Million in Private Capital From Investors – Finance Bitcoin News

Published

on

Reuben Jackson

As the decentralized finance movement proves its staying power and resilience, one of the world’s largest decentralized autonomous organizations, Bitdao, has concluded a private fundraising round to promote mass adoption of open finance.

DAO to Allocate Capital Towards Improving Defi R&D, Funding, & Liquidity

As decentralized finance (defi) slowly regains its footing following the May decline in total value locked, there is no shortage of investment capital chasing after the idea’s tremendous potential.

Bitdao, a decentralized autonomous organization focused on defi, is launching following the successful conclusion of a $230 million private funding round. The private capital raise featured participation from more than 20 institutions and defi partners, including hedge fund manager Alan Howard, well-known entrepreneur Peter Thiel, Dragonfly Capital, Fenbushi, Founders Fund, Jump Capital, Pantera Capital, and Spartan Group, among others.

To resolve the Bitcoin network’s persistent throughput issues and Ethereum’s high transaction cost, Bitdao’s multichain design intends to unseat existing centralized pegged tokens that pose censorship and counterparty risks through a fast and affordable decentralized solution. The organization’s native BDAO governance and defi token is pegged to the value of bitcoin, with plans to introduce other pegs in the future for coins like ethereum.

The fresh capital will be allocated to multiple areas of operation, including research and development, funding, and liquidity operations. Attracting developer talent is one of the primary aims of this initiative, and capital will also be distributed as grants and token swaps to support blockchain technologies. In addition, contributions to the Bitdao treasury will be used to back partners, add liquidity, and help bootstrap new protocols in decentralized exchange (dex) platforms, lending, and synthetics.

Besides this funding, Bybit, one of Bitdao’s ardent supporters, has pledged 2.5 basis points from all futures contracts transaction volume on its platform in recurring support to the treasury. Based on the platform’s 2021’s transaction volumes, this figure could reach $1 billion annually, helping underpin Bitdao’s mission of improving adoption, collaboration, and innovation within decentralized finance as inclusively as possible.

What do you think about Bitdao raising $230 million? Let us know what you think about this subject in the comments section below.

Image Credits: Shutterstock, Pixabay, Wiki Commons

Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only. It is not a direct offer or solicitation of an offer to buy or sell, or a recommendation or endorsement of any products, services, or companies. Bitcoin.com does not provide investment, tax, legal, or accounting advice. Neither the company nor the author is responsible, directly or indirectly, for any damage or loss caused or alleged to be caused by or in connection with the use of or reliance on any content, goods or services mentioned in this article.





Source link

Continue Reading

Trending